<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Off-site, out of sight</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/?p=611</link>
	<description>The Blog of Andrew - at AndrewSW.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: AndrewSW: Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/?p=611#comment-641</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 01:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/?p=611#comment-641</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Building pages separately doesn't scale - but I may do it anyway&lt;/strong&gt;
Richard moved to MovableType while Kate moved away from it for a variety of reasons.

If I had to summarize the key points it is that the &quot;build the page offline so that it can be served really fast&quot; idea doesn't seem to scale well. It works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Building pages separately doesn&#8217;t scale - but I may do it anyway</strong><br />
Richard moved to MovableType while Kate moved away from it for a variety of reasons.</p>
<p>If I had to summarize the key points it is that the &#8220;build the page offline so that it can be served really fast&#8221; idea doesn&#8217;t seem to scale well. It works&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/?p=611#comment-629</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 04:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/?p=611#comment-629</guid>
					<description>hmm, following line was missing the &quot;fun&quot;. Wonder if that's a telling ommision :-) Should read:

&quot;Not as much as *fun* as you’re having, judging by this post!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, following line was missing the &#8220;fun&#8221;. Wonder if that&#8217;s a telling ommision :-) Should read:</p>
<p>&#8220;Not as much as *fun* as you’re having, judging by this post!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/?p=611#comment-628</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 04:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/?p=611#comment-628</guid>
					<description>I think your multimedia blog is an excellent idea! I see a few of my favourite bloggers getting all multimedia recently (with music-logging and so on), so I really should get with the program and do something myself. But currently I'm immersed in work and also migrating to Movable Type with RW/W. Not as much as you're having, judging by this post!

ps I've read your WeAreBlog paper and it's excellent. I hope you follow up on some of the ideas in this paper, as I don't see many other people thinking along those lines (which is a good thing IMHO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your multimedia blog is an excellent idea! I see a few of my favourite bloggers getting all multimedia recently (with music-logging and so on), so I really should get with the program and do something myself. But currently I&#8217;m immersed in work and also migrating to Movable Type with RW/W. Not as much as you&#8217;re having, judging by this post!</p>
<p>ps I&#8217;ve read your WeAreBlog paper and it&#8217;s excellent. I hope you follow up on some of the ideas in this paper, as I don&#8217;t see many other people thinking along those lines (which is a good thing IMHO).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
